Table of contents
In commercial contract negotiations, much of the attention is understandably devoted to key factors like the scope, price, payment, timelines, and obligations. However, one critical element is often somewhat overlooked or paid lesser attention: the terms that govern the conclusion of the relationship. Whether by expiry, mutual agreement, or termination for cause, all agreements will eventually come to an end. Failing to give proper attention to the mechanics around ending a relationship exposes parties to legal and financial risks, particularly if the breakdown of a commercial relationship results in dispute or litigation.
Why the End of an Agreement Is as Important as the Beginning
It is natural to view the end of an agreement as a distant concern, secondary to the primary objective of getting the deal done and the relationship underway. This mindset is understandable, but time and again it is one that causes issues when expectations and assumptions don’t align with contractual terms.
Disputes post-termination tend to be particularly fraught. Trust between parties has usually eroded, the stakes are high, and commercial pressures tend to lead to aggressive legal posturing.
In many cases, underdeveloped termination provisions can result in uncertainty around the more important aspects of an agreement. These ambiguities frequently form the basis of commercial litigation (or at the very least a lengthy dispute resolution process) which consumes time, money, and attention better directed elsewhere.
Common Pitfalls and Their Consequences
- Final payments: If an agreement does not clearly specify how payments are to be calculated and made upon termination (particularly, for example, if services are capable of being partially delivered) the parties will likely find themselves in a dispute. Alternatively, if the parties had carefully contemplated what payments will be made upon termination and how they are to be calculated, the clear and explicit contractual terms will assist the parties to avoid a protracted dispute.
- Transitional obligations: When agreements lack clear provisions governing the handover of responsibilities, finalisation of outstanding work, or the return of property and information, parties often struggle to disengage smoothly. This can result in confusion over ongoing duties, or the premature cessation of essential services. In some cases, one party may be left in a vulnerable position, without access to critical systems, data, or personnel. In others, one party may be forced to provide services over and above what they had intended. These scenarios not only strain relationships but also create fertile ground for legal disputes.
- Reputational damage: We see a significant risk for reputational damage where there is an absence of clearly defined post-termination obligations around the misuse, ownership, and return of confidential materials and intellectual property. Whether inadvertently or deliberately, if one party continues to use their counterpart’s proprietary materials, trade secrets, or branding elements after a contract ends, the damage to reputation can be immediate and far-reaching, beyond what can be rectified by damages or other legal remedies. As a result, it is important to contemplate how confidential information and intellectual property will be returned on expiry of an agreement, particularly in respect of early termination.
The Litigation Perspective: Prevention Is The Best Cure
From a litigation perspective, we often see contractual disputes arising from poorly defined exit mechanisms. In turn, courts are tasked with interpreting ambiguous clauses, determining the parties’ intentions, or implying terms to give effect to a resolution in light of the materials at hand. These proceedings are costly, often uncertain, and usually avoidable.
In contrast, agreements that utilise comprehensive termination clauses, including mechanisms for notice, obligations on termination, final payment structures, and tailored dispute resolution pathways, are far less likely to result in litigation. Even where disputes would have otherwise arisen, we find that coming to an understanding on the pre and post-termination obligations (and procedures) during negotiation often results in the parties’ avoiding issues altogether, by limiting assumptions on both sides.
What Should a Termination Clause Cover?
Australian businesses should engage a lawyer who is well-versed in drafting termination clauses which address the following:
- Grounds for Termination: Clear articulation of the conditions under which the contract may be terminated, whether for breach, convenience, or by mutual consent.
- Notice Requirements: Detailed processes for providing notice of termination, including timeframes and method of delivery.
- Final Payments: A mechanism to calculate amounts due upon termination, including treatment of work in progress, refunds, and final invoices.
- Return of Property: Obligations to return physical property, confidential information, and intellectual property.
- Survival of Obligations: Stipulation of which obligations continue post-termination, and if necessary, which are clearly intended to be limited to the life of the contract.
- Dispute Resolution: A clear and agreed method for resolving disputes should they arise, and who is to bear the costs of the process.
A Strategic Advantage
Ultimately, an agreement that is well-prepared for its conclusion offers more than legal protection, it provides commercial clarity. Businesses that can exit partnerships cleanly and confidently are better positioned to pursue new opportunities and preserve ongoing relationships. Equally, knowing that you will be treated fairly and in accordance with agreed terms at the end of an agreement can reduce the emotional and financial toll that often accompanies commercial disputes.
Planning for the end of a contract is prudent risk management and as legal advisors, our role is to make sure that our clients are not only protected during the life of their agreements, but are also empowered to move on with certainty and security when the time comes.
Last updated: 25 June 2025
